Search & Seizure Of Electronic Evidence

search and seizure of electronic evidence: OUR EXPERTISE

OUR EXPERience 

GP Bouwer  is a leading expert in the search and seizure of electronic evidence. From a legal and investigative perspective we have more than 20 years experience in the search and seizure of evidence and specifically electronic evidence. Gideon first started investigating cyber crime in 2003. 

GP Bouwer attained 13 years experience as a SAPS detective in the search and seizure of electronic evidence. This experience entailed the application of search warrants, section 205 applications, gathering of evidence, the search and seizure of electronic evidence and giving of evidence pertaining to his investigations. 

GP Bouwer has further worked together with cyber forensics computer experts in the SAPS, as an attorney and forensics investigator. 
2d illustration Finger Print
Miniature people : Police And Detective finding proof from credit card in crime scene, Cyber crime concept

qualifications 

GP Bouwer holds a masters degree in information technology law and is published on the search and seizure of electronic evidence in the South African  Journal of Criminal Justice (SACJ):

Search and seizure of electronic evidence: Division of the traditional one-step process into a new two-step process in a South African context

Gideon is also referred to in Juta - Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act (Du Toit); Search and seizure of electronic evidence (RS 55, 2015 ch2-p13). 


search and seizure of electronic evidence: Unlawful Warrants Issued

GP Bouwer  attorneys specialises in the legal aspects of search warrants issued under chapter two of The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (CPA) relating to the search and seizure of electronic evidence. 

The CPA and the legal principles underlying the search and seizure of  evidence was written at a time when the internet, electronic evidence and the search and seizure of electronic evidence had not yet been conceived. This fact has made chapter two of the CPA a very inadequate and uncertain instrument in facilitating the issuing of properly formulated warrants for the search and seizure of electronic evidence. 

GP Bouwer attorneys analyses and identifies warrants that have been issued illegally and unlawfully.  
digital evidence
Miniature people : Police And Detective are working on smartphone , Crime scene investigation , Cyber crimes concept

search and seizure of electronic evidence: Unlawful execution of warrants

The unlawful execution of a search and seizure warrant is commonly mistaken and or grouped together with the unlawful issuing of a search and seizure warrant. Different legal rules and procedures apply with regards the issuing and subsequent execution of a search and seizure warrant.

GP Bouwer attorneys are experts in the analysis and identification of what procedure in law was not applied correctly and consequently on what basis an illegal search and seizure warrant must be challenged on.  

search and seizure of electronic evidence: Anton Piller order

In contrast to search warrants issued under chapter two of The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (CPA), an Anton Pillar order is based on common law and is derived from English law. It is a civil remedy whereby an applicant makes an application to a court for the search and seizure of a document or article  to which they have a prima facie personal or real right to, with the intention to preserve evidence. 

The search for and the subsequent seizure of electronic evidence plays a dominant  role in the modern day  application and execution of Anton Pillar orders. GP Bouwer attorneys are experts in the lawful application and execution of Anton Pillar orders which includes or pertains to electronic evidence.

Conversely GP Bouwer attorneys can expertly challenge and identify unlawfully issued and or executed Anton Pillar orders with regards to the search and seizure of electronic evidence. 
Anton Piller order written on the keyboard button

Consultation